Educational Media Reviews Online

What is it that is achieved when a prisoner is put to death? The film explores the emotional benefits that may be associated with victim loss and the emotional trauma that is shared by the perpetrator’s family. Aside from the emotional benefits what does execution achieve toward changing the reality of the crime committed? Is “an eye for eye” retribution required in order for society to heal?

Van Hoewijk takes us on a visit with the survivors of both the crime and the perpetrator. Although the film’s focus is on the survivors of the prisoner we quickly realize that the family is in great despair. While the film dialogue is interesting and the photography and sound is very good it was somewhat difficult to stay attentive. Perhaps this is due to the director’s decision not to focus on a pro or con argument about the use of execution. The editing is disjointed and requires the viewer to concentrate closely on each scene.

Discussion groups may wish to use this film as part of an overall examination of other socio-economic issues related to crime and punishment in America. It may be helpful to evaluate the use of execution set in the context of group diversity through the lens of economics, social stigma or race. In consideration of the futility of death whether in retribution or in crime one message embedded in the film is “futility”. It is this futility that we see in the faces and narratives of the individuals interviewed. It may be that the film’s name “Killing Time” is a play on words. The message: killing is a futile exercise. All that is accomplished is more grief, hate, and guilt. Cinema Guild trailer

Awards
• Winner, Amsterdam Documentary Film Festival